Leviathan
Thomas Hobbes' "Leviathan" presents a stark view of human nature, positing that in the natural state, life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. This perspective underscores the inherent conflict and self-interest that drive human behavior. Hobbes argues that to escape this chaotic state, individuals enter into a social contract, surrendering certain freedoms to a sovereign authority in exchange for security and order. The Leviathan, as the embodiment of this absolute authority, symbolizes the necessity of strong governance to curb humanity's baser instincts.
The figure of Socrates has emerged as a profound hero within this context. His relentless pursuit of truth and virtue in the face of societal opposition encapsulates the Hobbesian struggle against the brutish elements of human nature. Socrates, through his dialectical method, sought to illuminate the path of reason and ethical conduct. Socrates' dialogues were not merely about abstract reasoning but were deeply embedded in the socio-political milieu of ancient Athens. The language and context of his era shaped his philosophical endeavors, making his heroism a reflection of both his personal virtues and the societal constructs he challenged.
Julius Caesar stands as a complex figure straddling the line between hero and anti-hero. In the late Roman Republic, marked by political corruption and civil strife, Caesar’s military genius and political acumen brought both order and tyranny. His actions, driven by an insatiable desire for power, align with Hobbesian principles. Yet, Caesar’s reforms, aimed at stabilizing Rome and extending citizenship, reflect a nuanced understanding of sovereignty. Wittgenstein’s perspective on the fluidity of language and meaning is evident in the contrasting narratives surrounding Caesar. To some, he was a savior who transformed Rome; to others, a tyrant who subverted the Republic. This duality exemplifies the complexity of heroism within the framework of the Leviathan, where the consolidation of power can simultaneously safeguard and threaten societal order.
In the medieval context of feudal France, the narrative of Joan of Arc provides a compelling intersection of divine inspiration and militant nationalism. Joan’s visions and subsequent military leadership challenged the established norms of gender and power. Her heroism is deeply rooted in the religious and socio-political language games of her time. Her visions, interpreted as divine mandates, mobilized a nation and defied conventional gender roles. Joan’s trial and execution, followed by her eventual canonization, reflect the shifting linguistic and cultural constructs that redefine heroism.
We see a progression from ancient mythological figures to modern-day heroes, shaped by the changing contexts of language and society. The Renaissance brought a renewed emphasis on individual achievement, as exemplified by figures like Leonardo da Vinci, whose polymathic endeavors embodied the ideal of the Renaissance man. The Enlightenment further redefined heroism through the lens of reason and progress, with figures like George Washington embodying the principles of liberty and democratic governance.
In contemporary society, the concept of heroism has expanded to include global and cross-cultural dimensions. Figures such as Nelson Mandela and Malala Yousafzai represent the modern hero, whose actions transcend national boundaries and resonate with global aspirations for justice and human rights. The role of media and technology in constructing these hero narratives highlights the dynamic interplay between individual actions and societal perceptions, a theme that echoes Wittgenstein’s insights into the contextual nature of meaning.
The construction and dissemination of hero and anti-hero narratives are heavily influenced by media and technology. The psychological impact of these narratives is amplified through constant exposure and reinforcement via digital platforms. Social media, in particular, creates a dynamic environment where heroic and anti-heroic figures are continually shaped, contested, and redefined. This constant flux challenges traditional notions of heroism and highlights the fluidity of psychological constructs in the digital age.
The psychological underpinnings of heroism and anti-heroism can also be examined through the lens of social identity theory. This theory posits that individuals derive a significant part of their identity from their membership in social groups. Heroes and anti-heroes serve as focal points for group identity, embodying the values, aspirations, and conflicts inherent within the group. The psychological processes of identification, idealization, and projection play crucial roles in how individuals relate to and internalize the qualities of these figures.
The construct of the hero often involves traits such as courage, altruism, and resilience. These traits are admired and valorized within society, creating a framework for individuals to aspire to heroic behavior. The hero archetype serves as a model for prosocial behavior, promoting values that support social cohesion and collective well-being. From a developmental psychology perspective, the internalization of heroic ideals can significantly influence an individual's moral and ethical development, encouraging behaviors that align with societal expectations and norms.
Conversely, the anti-hero embodies traits that challenge or subvert traditional heroic qualities. Anti-heroes often possess a complex mix of admirable and flawed characteristics, reflecting the multifaceted nature of human psychology. The anti-hero’s actions may be driven by personal gain, revenge, or a rejection of societal norms, highlighting the tension between individual desires and collective values. The psychological appeal of the anti-hero lies in their relatability and the nuanced portrayal of human imperfections. This complexity resonates with individuals who recognize similar conflicts and ambiguities within themselves.
Hobbes’ view aligns with the concept of the id in Freudian theory. The id represents the primal, instinctual drives within humans, including desires for survival, dominance, and pleasure. In the state of nature described by Hobbes, these drives operate unchecked, leading to constant conflict and competition. The establishment of the Leviathan can be seen as the imposition of the superego, which enforces societal rules and norms to regulate these base impulses and maintain social harmony.
The evolution of heroism can be traced through the changing contexts of language and society, as Wittgenstein suggests. In ancient times, heroes were often mythological figures whose stories were transmitted through oral traditions and epic poetry. These heroes embodied the ideals and values of their cultures, serving as moral exemplars and protectors of the community. Over time, the concept of the hero evolved to include historical figures whose actions had a profound impact on their societies.
The study of heroism through a Wittgensteinian lens reveals that the meaning of heroism is deeply contextual, shaped by the language games and forms of life within different societies. Wittgenstein's perspective emphasizes that the concept of the hero is not static but evolves with the changing linguistic and cultural contexts. This understanding allows us to appreciate the complexity and variability of heroism across different historical periods and cultural settings.
Globalization and the increasing interconnectedness of societies could lead to the emergence of cross-cultural heroes who unite diverse populations around global causes. Furthermore, addressing global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and social inequality may give rise to new heroes whose actions are pivotal in shaping the future of humanity.
In the context of amor fati, these heroes, despite their circumstances and the challenges they face, embody the acceptance and love of fate. They demonstrate that through embracing their destiny, they can influence positive change and inspire others.
cite
primary works:
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan.
Hobbes presents a stark view of human nature and argues for the necessity of a social contract to escape the chaotic state of nature.
Plato. The Dialogues of Plato (Trans. Benjamin Jowett).
Socratic dialogues that showcase Socrates' pursuit of truth and virtue within the socio-political context of ancient Athens.
Suetonius. The Twelve Caesars.
Accounts of Julius Caesar's life, highlighting his complex role as both a hero and a potential tyrant in the late Roman Republic.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations.
Discusses the fluidity of language and meaning, which can be applied to understanding the narratives around historical figures like Julius Caesar.
Pernoud, Régine. Joan of Arc By Herself and Her Witnesses.
Examines Joan of Arc's life and the socio-political and religious contexts that shaped her heroism.
Isaacson, Walter. Leonardo da Vinci.
Biography that illustrates Leonardo da Vinci's polymathic endeavors and his embodiment of Renaissance ideals.
Ellis, Joseph J. His Excellency: George Washington.
Explores George Washington's leadership and how he embodied Enlightenment principles of liberty and democratic governance.
Mandela, Nelson. Long Walk to Freedom.
Autobiography detailing Mandela's struggle for justice and human rights, embodying modern heroism.
Yousafzai, Malala. I Am Malala.
Autobiography of Malala Yousafzai, highlighting her fight for education and human rights, representing global heroism.
Tajfel, Henri. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology.
Provides insight into social identity theory and how heroes and anti-heroes influence group identity.
Freud, Sigmund. The Ego and the Id.
Discusses the id, ego, and superego, which can be related to Hobbes' views on human nature and societal regulation.
Seligman, Martin E.P., and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. "Positive Psychology: An Introduction." American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, 2000, pp. 5-14.
Introduces positive psychology, aligning with the principles of amor fati in fostering well-being and resilience.
